Facebook PixelIndividual-owned corporate farming
Brainstorming
Tour
Brainstorming
Brainstorming
Create newCreate new
EverythingEverything
ChallengesChallenges
IdeasIdeas
Guide
TourRulesAbout
Idea

Individual-owned corporate farming

Image credit: Photo by DoDo PHANTHAMALY from Pexels

Loading...
Shubhankar Kulkarni
Shubhankar Kulkarni Sep 09, 2020
Please leave the feedback on this idea
Originality

Is it original or innovative?

Feasibility

Is it feasible?

Necessity

Is it targeting an unsolved problem?

Conciseness

Is it concisely described?

Bounty for the best solution

Provide a bounty for the best solution

Bounties attract serious brainpower to the challenge.

Currency *
Bitcoin
Who gets the Bounty *
Distribution
Corporate farming is agriculture on large-scale farms owned by large companies. This is a growing trend in several countries. The companies also indulge in selling agricultural products, providing agricultural education, carrying out related research, and influencing public policy. Corporate farming has several merits:
  1. Reduced food wastage at all stages from growing the crop (limiting wastage due to diseases) through wastage during harvesting to wastage during transportation to the consumer.
  2. Increased quality and quantity of the yield
  3. Implementation of improved technology: Reduced wastage and high yield facilitate finance for research and technology.
  4. Reduced selling price of the agricultural products due to large-scale production
  5. Increased contribution of agriculture (again due to increased revenue) to the Gross Domestic Product, again contributing to the economy.
The demerits of corporate farming include:
  1. Lower profits for the individual farmers due to growing competition from the corporate farmers.
  2. Risk of monopoly since only a few companies will control the production of food (the most important necessity) in a country.
  3. Unavailability of expert labor (farmers)
There are also some demerits to regular individual farming:
  1. Reduced farm size for future generations (if the number of progeny increases).
  2. Droughts and floods affect yield, and thereby, sustainability.
  3. Dependence on activities other than farming increases.
To avail the benefits of corporate farming and simultaneously eliminate the demerits of individual and corporate farming, I suggest individual-owned corporate farming -
  1. As the name suggests, companies (or preferably the government) will lease the farms from the farmers for a minimum period of 10 years.
  2. Adjoining farms will be merged and bigger farms will be created.
  3. Only the farmers that agree to lease out their farms will be employed by the corporate to work there. The corporate will only provide management. The farming and transport jobs will be divided amongst the farmers. These farmers will be paid appropriate monthly wages irrespective of the yield. If possible, the corporates can share some percentage of the profit with the farmers.
  4. Bigger corporates are capable of tackling droughts (for example, by digging canals from rivers) and floods (building and managing dams). Farmers from a certain region face the same problems more or less (drought, flood, or raiding by the animals). Instead of handling N different farms by providing assistance to the N different associated farmers, handling a single big farm is comparatively easier.
  5. In this case, the cost of buying the land for the corporates reduces to zero.
  6. Individual ownership by the farmers will also eliminate the negative vibe around "corporate farming".
Can you suggest any improvements? Is there any aspect here that can potentially backfire?

farmingcorporate farming
Creative contributions
Know someone who can contribute to this idea? Share it with them on , , or

Add your creative contribution

0 / 200

Added via the text editor

Sign up or

or

Guest sign up

* Indicates a required field

By using this platform you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

General comments

Loading...
Daniel Drazhi
Daniel Drazhia year ago
Juran Shubhankar KulkarniYahi MenezesConisdering you mentioned farms, why. not instead have a product where farms can sign up and list the good that they sell vegetables fruits etc. People can choose what goods they want, quantity, and they place an order. The farm gets notification that someone has ordered from them. This would work good locally Ithink, but the delivery is an issue. Any brainstormers here, who have an idea how might delivery work? Ideally, the customers would be able to order different goods from different farms all in one cart.(one order)
Please leave the feedback on this idea
Loading...
J. Nikola
J. Nikolaa year ago
Daniel Drazhi Good idea. That's what some apps in my country are targeting right now, but the problem of delivery remains. I imagine a few scenarios:
  • delivery via "fresh packages" - country-wide post offices implement "fresh package delivery" via vans and trucks by embedding a small-size "refrigerator"; since they already have a distribution network, the software, and the workforce, this should not be a problem
  • regional distribution centers - building pop-up storage for every region, where a local farmer, once the order is set, can deliver the goods and from there the goods are distributed further; I imagine 20-30 regional centers in the country which work like marketplaces and fairs, too; from there the distribution could be organized by Bolt Food, Uber Eats, Wolt, Glovo or a similar app
  • delivery via "fresh packages" by buses - the same idea as above but via local bus network; embedding a "fresh corner" in bus cargo compartment; a good way for bus companies to earn money even when they don't have many passengers
Please leave the feedback on this idea
Loading...
J. Nikola
J. Nikola3 years ago
The idea is excellent! Farmers usually have a problem of inconstant income, highly dependent on the yield and thus, not being eligible for credits and mortgages. This would allow them to live more comfortably. But it could make big problems for a company to have stabile money income all-year-round. The key is to spread the business all over the region/country to minimize the effects of bad weather. Also, all varieties of crops should be seeded, to ensure the balanced yield throughout the year. But palms up for this idea that could transform agriculture, especially in smaller countries!
Please leave the feedback on this idea
Loading...
Yahi Menezes
Yahi Menezes3 years ago
I may have misunderstood some aspects of the proposal and I don't have practical experience in the field, but personally and ideally, I would go for a more "democratic" internal organisation system of the company, like a cooperative or some federative-like organisation, which I believe could potentially maintain most benefits of corporate farming while additionally ensuring: more equally distribution of decision power, ensuring that local farmers' needs are attended; more equal distribution of profits along people directly involved in the "production to selling process" (from farmworkers to managers); prevention of unprincipled corporate lobbying that may promote local environment and community degradation (like what happens nowadays in Brazil, for example), which may also be attained by preventing concentration of power of one associated farm (there could be an upper-limit in individual farm size, thereby maintaining internal compatibility). Some guiding principles of a cooperative: https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity
Please leave the feedback on this idea
Loading...
Darko Savic
Darko Savic3 years ago
Complement farming with electricity production. It's called Agrivoltaics. 1/3 of sunlight hits the panels while the rest goes to the crops. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2019/agrophotovoltaics-hight-harvesting-yield-in-hot-summer-of-2018.html
Please leave the feedback on this idea