Think of it like crisis management using focus groups. A business has a problem that they need a solution to, Say expanding to a new region or a marketing strategy for a new product, or a change in management style. They ask for the best way to do something and they get answers.
Cancel culture- We live in an era where one slip up and the entire world cancels you. Internal teams although diverse can't keep up with every new movement or social rationale. The public, however, can and you can channel that for profit.
Diversify opinions- Cultures, nationalistic principles, regional ideals and viewpoints are not something that can really be understood by reading about. Getting a mixed up group of as many people as you can all working toward a solution for you is an Ideal situation.
Avoid generalization errors. Helps avoid businesses from coming off as tacky to their intended market.This happens when you ask people who studied a group of people what that group wants instead of asking the actual group.
Work from home movement- With ongoing shifts in workplace structure, working remoteley is getting popular. A virtual office with an active global crisis managemement system would be a big help in making that shift.
Winning over new markets- With information from "in-crowds", even niche markets can be accessed easily and a brand can make products specifically for them.
Once hired as part of the team you choose which groups of the general demographic you belong to based on your own ideations, culture as well as groups you belong to. These act like tags and grouping people with similar tags together creates an idea pool of people with the same general principles bt each slightly different from each other. The pools will also tend to show polarizations showing vastl differences in principles but also the points at which they overlap.
The whole group must agree not to get personal or take opinions from other members personally, That is the only condition. The goal is to reach a mutually agreeable solution while avoiding all social biases.
Everyone is annonymous to other members of the group and only moderators know the actual identity of everyone. An identity tag is provided to keep tag of ones contribution and a track record can be recorded to determine the most useful participants.
A company presents it's problems to the owner of the site. After which using an algorithm to choose people randomly from the target demgraphic using their own tags . A room is created ands a deadline for a solution set.
Once a room is generated the members assess the problems and come up with different solutions, Then without external influence, the menbers of the room arrange the solutions in terms of which is more pallateable to the groups they associate with and identify the most agreeable solution for everyone involved. Other alternative paths to reach the same goal could also be presented.Once a solution is found a draft is written and presented to the company. If it is a desirable solution the company accepts it and the room is disbanded, If not he room takes in the feedback and makes the necessary accomodations.
Why this is the best framework
Allow companies to get willing feedback from different groups by simply joining as many tags as they need together.
The annonymity means people can be honest without letting their pride as members of a group affect their responses.
It gives people of opposing opinins a chance to work togethe on a project that is mutually beneficial to them and in the process they get a better understanding of each other.
It also allows for personal growth as interaction with other open minded individuals of different education and culture is enriching to your worldview.
It's self correcting nature. If fixing problems is what you do, it is inevitable to end up correcting yourself.
It could act as a psychological model by asking the participants annually how working there has shifted their perspective on matters. Such a model could be used to find ways to help people get along despite their differences.
Identifying where you stand on matters personally, without external influence should always be the first step before weighing in your opinion on any matter.