An AI-aided socioeconomic system where people can personalize the rules they wish to live by via a government-run no-code platform.
An AI-aided attempt at letting everyone live the way they want within the possibilities that make it fair to everyone else.
People have different tastes and preferences. We should not be forced to fit into one box - especially when it comes to our lives.
A better socioeconomic system.
"No-code" development platforms allow programmers and especially non-programmers to create application software through graphical user interfaces and configuration instead of traditional computer programming.
Look at it this way: The users get a nice graphical interface where they select, arrange, and configure the visual representation of what they want to achieve. It's as simple as playing a videogame. In the background, the software assembles all the necessary code and deals with the relationships between all parts. It then outputs the finished product. No programming skills required even though heavy programming was done in the background.
This idea proposes the application of similar principle to socioeconomic systems.
Large, interconnected systems involving millions of parameters and their interactions are too complex for the human brain to handle. Software handles them with ease.
Any advanced socioeconomic system is on the border of complexity an average human can grasp. For example, people dislike taxes because we don't necessarily understand how they fit in the grand scheme of things. Why do some countries have tax X and others can get by without it? Why does a rich person pay a different tax percentage than a poor person? Why can't we have all the benefits we know about without any of the responsibilities we've heard some people get by without?
Software juggles millions/billions of parameters with ease. A self-learning neural network gets better at doing its job with training/iterations.
So imagine if we disected all aspects of all socioeconomic systems that we know. We create a testing environment much like SimCity the game. We let AlphaGo-like AI master the hell out of it. Eventually we let it start suggesting small scale experiments aimed at improving the actual conditions within some countries that are willing to try.
The goal is to maximize the wellbeing and happiness of the citizens without letting the socioeconomic system crumble.
Repeat this for any type of system that we know of (capitalism, comunism, socialism, etc.). When the AI masters them all, mix all their elements into one big pot of features.
By iteration, the AI eventually figures out the optimal parameters of a mixed system where people are maximally happy and the system runs smoothly. I imagine even that would not be good enough for everyone. People are different, so let...
Everyone design their own rules
Everyone can tweak their own preferences via a graphical user interface (no-code style).
For example, a person might not want to pay taxes, but wants free healthcare and free education anyway. They also don't want to go to work but want social security anyway. What do they have to do to make that happen? What benefits to they loose and what obligations to they have to take on? The AI shows a set of rules that the person would have to adhere to if they wanted to live by the changes they configured.
Any aspect you change potentially affects everything else. You can start with the aspects that are the most important to you and let the less important ones change first.
Equal contribution but in different ways
The AI ensures that everyone contributes equally, regardless of whether it's money, time, work, or whatever else people can do for the well being of others. No one can contribute less than what is required (or else they will be considered social parasites).
All the parameters are interconnected and move like a living being. You change something and see how it affects everything else. You can then decide whether you like the downsides/effects of whatever you changed.
Sure, people can opt and not contribute. But then they are out of the socioeconomic system and the society tries to take care of them like it does of stray animals. It does what it can for them, but not jeopardize the wellbeing of contributing members of society.
People who opt-out could also live in areas of the world that aren't (and never will be) governed by such a system. The system should have a no-expanssion policy.
For such a system to be universally accepted, people have to be able to trust that they will not be exploited. Additionally, they need to be able to verify that the AI knows what it's doing and that it couldn't be done better (yet).
The entire code should be open source.
There should be a public log of all the decisions and reasoning behind them.
Also a log of all the things that the AI has learned to do better as compared to the previous year.
Enforcing personalized rules
To be able to enforce everyone's personalized rules we would have to live in a 1984 Orwelian society where everything and everyone is under surveillance. That would suck. On the other hand, we are already halfway there.